Skip to content
← All solutions

Marketing teams

The segment that explains the drop is named before anyone builds the deck.

Campaign, source, content and conversion data sit in one model, and the daily brief arrives written. Reveliqo names the segment that explains most of a change, so the meeting starts at the decision instead of the spreadsheet.

The problem

Half of Monday goes on a deck that says traffic is up and conversions are down. By the time anyone asks why, I'm exporting CSVs again, and the answer lands after the budget decision it was meant to inform.

What changes

Reveliqo for Marketing teams

1

Questions instead of query builders

Ask why paid conversions fell last week. The question becomes an analysis plan over approved metrics and dimensions; the engine computes it and the answer comes back with the segment, the period and the figures it used.

2

Campaigns judged on outcomes

UTMs, referrers and ad platform parameters are resolved at the edge, then joined to conversions and revenue. Every channel is compared against the same conversion definition, so nothing rests on which platform claims the credit.

3

The explanation, not the alert

An anomaly arrives with the segment that explains most of the measured difference — a device, a browser, a country, a landing page — named as where the change sits, not as its cause.

Connect a site today. Read tomorrow's brief instead of building it.

Connect a site and the first brief arrives with the day's changes already explained — traffic separated from bots, conversions attached to revenue, and the evidence behind every sentence one click away.

Real people separated from bots Every answer shows its evidence Reveliqo runs on Reveliqo